<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This isn&#8217;t a circle to be squared</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.liturgy.org.uk/archives/189/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.liturgy.org.uk/archives/189</link>
	<description>Dana Delap's Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:23:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Collett</title>
		<link>http://www.liturgy.org.uk/archives/189/comment-page-1#comment-2140</link>
		<dc:creator>James Collett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 11:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liturgy.org.uk/?p=189#comment-2140</guid>
		<description>What would Al Murray say?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would Al Murray say?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Austin</title>
		<link>http://www.liturgy.org.uk/archives/189/comment-page-1#comment-2085</link>
		<dc:creator>David Austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 18:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liturgy.org.uk/?p=189#comment-2085</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comments Dana - as one of those &#039;Gay&#039; ordinands, I appreciate your thoughts here.

The Inclusive Church will always have an uncomfortable edge as it remains open to the outcast, leper &amp; those deemed &#039;unrighteous&#039; on the edges of our Church. May God give us grace to see with the eyes of faith &amp; listen with our hearts, and not just with our pre-conceptions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments Dana &#8211; as one of those &#8216;Gay&#8217; ordinands, I appreciate your thoughts here.</p>
<p>The Inclusive Church will always have an uncomfortable edge as it remains open to the outcast, leper &#038; those deemed &#8216;unrighteous&#8217; on the edges of our Church. May God give us grace to see with the eyes of faith &amp; listen with our hearts, and not just with our pre-conceptions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.liturgy.org.uk/archives/189/comment-page-1#comment-2082</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 20:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liturgy.org.uk/?p=189#comment-2082</guid>
		<description>John - that&#039;s a bit cryptic!

Dana - we have to find a way to make sure that this issue doesn&#039;t just disappear, while at the same time avoiding provoking WW3 between those who hold extreme views on either side.

Another observation. A friend of mine maintains that the sexuality debate and the debate over women&#039;s orders are precisely the wrong way round, in that the sexuality debate is argued in terms of theology and biblical analysis when it is actually an argument about equality, and the debate over women&#039;s orders is argued in terms of equality when it is actually an argument about theology and biblical interpretation. I&#039;m not necessarily convinced he&#039;s right, but it&#039;s an interesting way of looking at things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John &#8211; that&#8217;s a bit cryptic!</p>
<p>Dana &#8211; we have to find a way to make sure that this issue doesn&#8217;t just disappear, while at the same time avoiding provoking WW3 between those who hold extreme views on either side.</p>
<p>Another observation. A friend of mine maintains that the sexuality debate and the debate over women&#8217;s orders are precisely the wrong way round, in that the sexuality debate is argued in terms of theology and biblical analysis when it is actually an argument about equality, and the debate over women&#8217;s orders is argued in terms of equality when it is actually an argument about theology and biblical interpretation. I&#8217;m not necessarily convinced he&#8217;s right, but it&#8217;s an interesting way of looking at things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.liturgy.org.uk/archives/189/comment-page-1#comment-2080</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 07:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liturgy.org.uk/?p=189#comment-2080</guid>
		<description>One mouth...two ears...gifted by God...let us pray that they may be used as intended in equal proportion...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One mouth&#8230;two ears&#8230;gifted by God&#8230;let us pray that they may be used as intended in equal proportion&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

